Article
Injectable OA Treatments in Indian Practice - What Works, What’s Available
Injectable options for managing canine osteoarthritis (OA) have gained traction in India as veterinarians move toward multimodal and client-friendly protocols. These include anti- inflammatory agents, disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs), and monoclonal antibodies each targeting different mechanisms of pain and cartilage degradation.
One of the most advanced injectable therapies is bedinvetmab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits nerve growth factor (NGF) - a critical mediator of chronic pain. In a randomized, placebo-controlled study, bedinvetmab showed statistically significant improvements in mobility and quality of life in dogs with OA (Innes et al., 2025). Administered monthly as a subcutaneous injection, it is particularly suitable for dogs with renal disease or NSAID intolerance. Though it has become available in India, pricing may limit widespread adoption.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as meloxicam , firocoxib , and carprofen remain the first-line injectable and oral treatment in most Indian practices. While effective in reducing inflammation and pain, they require renal and hepatic monitoring, especially in geriatric patients.
Veterinarians also use pentosan polysulfate sodium, a DMOAD that enhances cartilage resilience and inhibits matrix metalloproteinases. Though off-label in India, anecdotal evidence and studies in Australia suggest it can be effective in slowing OA progression and improving joint function (Read et al., 1996).
Adjuncts such as glucosamine sulfate , chondroitin sulfate , and MSM (methylsulfonylmethane) are commonly prescribed, though evidence for injectable efficacy remains limited. Combining these with omega-3 fatty acids or physical rehabilitation may enhance outcomes.
Selection should be guided by clinical stage, client budget, and patient comorbidities. Injectable therapies provide an effective option when compliance with daily medication is difficult or when oral treatments are contraindicated.
References:
- Innes et al. (2025). https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary- science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1502218/full
- Read et al. (1996). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8683953
- Sanderson RO et al. (2009). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19346540
Related Contents
Article
Prognosis and Monitoring in Canine Leptospirosis: Knowing What to Expect
The clinical course of leptospirosis in dogs is highly variable, ranging from mild illness to fatal...
Article
Prevention and One Health Implications of Leptospirosis
Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, leptospirosis continues to pose a significant threat du...
Article
Field Diagnosis of Newcastle Disease in Poultry
Newcastle Disease (ND) is a highly contagious viral infection of poultry that continues to cause sev...
Article
Vaccination Strategies Against Newcastle Disease – Field Perspectives
Vaccination remains the cornerstone of Newcastle Disease control in poultry production sys...
Article
Emerging Diagnostic and Vaccine Technologies in Newcastle Disease
Advances in molecular biology and vaccine technology are reshaping the approach to Newcastle Disease...
Article
Infectious Bursal Disease in Poultry: Understanding the Virus Beyond the Basics
Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD), commonly known as Gumboro disease, remains one...
Article
Pathogenesis and Clinical Expression of IBD: What Every Field Veterinarian Should Recognize Early
Infectious Bursal Disease is not just a viral infection, it is a disease of immune destruc...
Article
Diagnosis, Vaccination, and Field Control of IBD: Bridging Gaps Between Theory and Practice
Despite widespread vaccination, Infectious Bursal Disease continues to cause outbreaks globally. The...